Industrial collision avoidance hardware for forklifts, cranes and mobile assets. Combine UWB/BLE/RTK with alerts, geofencing and safety automation.
GridRTLS supplies industrial collision avoidance systems
designed to reduce accident risk between vehicles, mobile equipment, and personnel.
This category focuses on safety response and alert behavior,
not on positioning accuracy or analytics dashboards.
In safety-critical environments, knowing where something is matters less than
how fast and how reliably the system reacts.
Collision avoidance systems are built around low-latency detection,
predictable alert paths, and clear responsibility boundaries.
These systems typically operate alongside RTLS platforms but are not dependent on
full positioning accuracy to trigger safety responses.
We work with system integrators, safety engineers, and industrial solution providers
implementing collision warning or avoidance systems for forklifts, cranes,
heavy vehicles, and restricted personnel zones.
If your project involves safety-critical interactions between people and equipment,
this page is intended to help you define alert logic, response paths,
and RFQ inputs, and move toward an RFQ-ready safety system configuration.
Designed to minimize response time between risk detection and alert output.
Supports audible, visual, vibration, or external system triggers depending on site rules.
Alert logic remains stable even in dense or noisy environments.
Can operate independently of full positioning accuracy when safety thresholds are met.
Supports multiple vehicles, zones, and personnel groups without logic conflicts.
Vehicle–person, vehicle–vehicle, or restricted-zone entry.
Maximum acceptable latency between detection and alert.
Buzzer, light, vibration, display, or system signal output.
Distance-based, zone-based, or rule-based conditions.
Dust, vibration, noise level, lighting, and temperature.
Standalone alert vs integration with RTLS or safety platform.
Expected system response in case of signal loss or power interruption.
Single site vs multi-site consistency requirements.
Customization for collision avoidance systems usually focuses on
alert behavior, thresholds, and integration interfaces
rather than cosmetic changes.
Because these systems are safety-related, customization scope
should be defined and validated early.
OEM/ODM projects may involve enclosure changes, alert hardware selection,
or system interface alignment.
Any change affecting detection logic or response timing should be treated
as a safety-critical modification.
Buzzer, light, vibration, or combined outputs.
Distance, zone size, or rule-based logic.
Digital output, network message, or platform API.
Mounting position affects detection behavior.
Behavior under communication or power failure.
Consistent safety behavior across deployments.
Collision avoidance systems should be integrated with a clear safety boundary.
They are responsible for detection and alerting, not incident analysis or reporting.
Common solution patterns where this category is typically used.
Where this category is most commonly deployed.
Evidence that matters to SI teams: how we lock BOMs, keep batch consistency, and ship integration-ready hardware.
pcat_factory_photos to show real installation proof.
Designed for industrial vehicle and site conditions.
Suitable for electrically noisy environments.
Alert behavior and response ownership defined per project.
Traceable batches support maintenance and replacement.
No. RTLS provides location data; collision avoidance focuses on immediate safety response.
No. It relies on proximity and trigger logic rather than exact coordinates.
Latency requirements should be defined per scenario and validated during testing.
Yes. Local alerting is common in safety-critical environments.
Audible, visual, vibration, and system-level signals depending on configuration.
Through careful trigger definition and zone configuration.
Yes, typically for logging or analysis, not for primary alert logic.
Fail-safe behavior should be defined at RFQ stage.
Through controlled configuration and batch validation.
Clarify collision scenarios, response time, alert paths, and fail-safe behavior<br /> before RFQ. This helps lock safety configuration early and avoid redesign later.<br />
Share your site layout and accuracy needs--we'll suggest a practical setup.